15U Boys



Power Rankings


15U Boys Power Rankings Tier I

TEAM NAME GP RkPts RkPts / GP W L WVU WVS WVL LVU LVS LVL
Attack Academy 2010 Boys 6 272 45.3 6 0 0 5 1 0 0 0
Relentless 2010 Boys - East 6 254 42.3 5 1 0 5 0 0 1 0
Empire 2010 Boys - JM 6 216 36.0 4 2 0 3 1 0 2 0
Evolve 2010 Boys 6 206 34.3 4 2 0 3 1 0 2 0
Crossover 2010 Boys 6 182 30.3 3 3 0 3 0 0 2 1
Summit 2010 Boys 6 174 29.0 3 3 0 2 1 0 2 1
Ignite 2010 Boys - J/A 6 160 26.7 3 3 0 0 3 0 3 0
Ambush 2010 Boys - Ghosts 6 148 24.7 2 4 0 1 1 0 4 0
Empire 2010 Boys - KD 6 134 22.3 2 4 0 0 2 0 3 1
REFRESH 2010 BOYS 6 92 15.3 1 5 0 0 1 0 3 2

15U Boys Power Rankings Tier II

TEAM NAME GP RkPts RkPts / GP W L WVU WVS WVL LVU LVS LVL
Relentless 2010 Boys - West 6 260 43.3 5 1 2 3 0 0 1 0
Relentless 2011 Boys - East 6 252 42.0 4 2 1 3 0 2 0 0
Junior Bisons 2010 Boys 6 252 42.0 5 1 0 5 0 1 0 0
Ambush 2010 Boys - Pirates 6 194 32.3 3 3 1 2 0 0 3 0
World Class 2010 Boys - Rise 6 188 31.3 3 3 0 2 1 1 2 0
Triumph 2010 Boys 6 166 27.7 2 4 1 1 0 0 4 0
COBRAS 2010 Boys 6 136 22.7 1 5 0 1 0 1 4 0
DElite 2010 Boys 6 128 21.3 2 4 0 0 2 0 3 1

15U Boys Power Rankings Tier III

TEAM NAME GP RkPts RkPts / GP W L WVU WVS WVL LVU LVS LVL
Up Next 2010 Boys 6 214 35.7 4 2 1 3 0 0 2 0
PBL Select 2010 Boys 6 210 35.0 3 3 0 3 0 3 0 0
Central Plains 2010 Boys 6 196 32.7 3 3 0 3 0 2 1 0
World Class 2010 Boys - Surge 6 168 28.0 2 4 0 2 0 2 2 0
Junior Royals 2010 Boys 6 158 26.3 2 4 0 2 0 1 3 0
Team Mayhem 2010 Boys 6 104 17.3 0 6 0 0 0 1 5 0
Wolf Pack 2010 Boys 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

 

We use the Power Ranking Formula to ensure the most fair and accurate seeding for the championship tournament. Here's why:

  1. Cross-Divisional and Cross-Tier Games:

    • Throughout the season, teams play against opponents from different divisions and tiers. This creates variability in the level of competition faced by each team.
  2. Strength of Schedule:

    • The formula considers the difficulty of each team's schedule. A win against a higher-tier or higher-ranked team is weighted more heavily than a win against a lower-tier team.
    • This ensures that teams are rewarded for performing well against stronger competition.
  3. Balanced Assessment:

    • By using the formula, we avoid simple win-loss records as the sole determinant for seeding. Instead, the formula provides a more nuanced evaluation of team performance, taking into account both the quality of opponents and the outcomes of the games.
This system ensures that the tournament seeding reflects the true competitive standing of each team, promoting fairness and rewarding teams that excel against tougher opponents.
 
Ranking Formulation:
  • Award 50 points for a win over an upper tier opponent.
  • Award 20 points for a loss to an upper tier opponent.
  • Award 40 points for a victory over a same tier opponent.
  • Award 10 points for a loss to a same tier opponent.
  • Award 30 points for a win over a lower tier team.
  • Award 0 points for a loss to a lower tier team.
  • A forfeiture is a win for the team receiving the forfeiture and a loss for the team that does the forfeiting.
  • Each team receives 2 bonus points per each opponent wins regardless of class and the number of times played during regular season.
  • Divide the total number of points by the total number of regular season point-producing games played to determine mathematical point average.

Teams




RAMP Registration

Join thousands of association partners using RAMP Registration Solutions.

More Information

RAMP Official Assigning

#1 with Officials...for very good reasons.

More Information

RAMP Websites

Manage your identity from the palm of your hand to the top of your desk.

More Information

RAMP Team App

Keep your coaches, parents, athletes, and fans connected, seamlessly.

More Information