16U Boys
Power Rankings
16U Boys Power Rankings Tier I
| | GP | RkPts | RkPts/GP | W | L | WVU | WVS | WVL | LVU | LVS | LVL |
| Legacy 2010 Boys | 7 | 302 | 43.1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Attack Academy 2009 Boys | 6 | 246 | 41.0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Up Next 2009 Boys | 6 | 254 | 42.3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Magic Select 2010 Boys | 6 | 216 | 36.0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Ignite 2009 Boys - Cory | 6 | 184 | 30.7 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Ambush 2009 Boys - GOLD | 6 | 218 | 36.3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Summit 2009 Boys | 6 | 200 | 33.3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Team Mayhem 2009 Boys | 6 | 156 | 26.0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Ignite 2010 Boys - Charles | 6 | 162 | 27.0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Relentless 2009 Boys - East | 4 | 110 | 27.5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Empire 2009 Boys | 6 | 156 | 26.0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| Legacy 2009 Boys | 6 | 156 | 26.0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
16U Boys Power Rankings Tier II
| | GP | RkPts | RkPts/GP | W | L | WVU | WVS | WVL | LVU | LVS | LVL |
| World Class 2009 Boys | 6 | 216 | 36.0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Ambush 2009 Boys - Knights | 6 | 206 | 34.3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Relentless 2009 Boys - West | 4 | 140 | 35.0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| DElite 2009 Boys | 5 | 150 | 30.0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Crossover 2009 Boys | 6 | 168 | 28.0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Ambush 2009 Boys - Raiders | 6 | 182 | 30.3 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| Junior Bisons 2009 Boys | 6 | 156 | 26.0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| Downtown Dawgs 2009 Boys | 6 | 162 | 27.0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| Atlas 2009 Boys - Black | 6 | 106 | 17.7 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 |
| Atlas 2009 Boys - Gold | 6 | 116 | 19.3 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 |
We use the Power Ranking Formula to ensure the most fair and accurate seeding for the championship tournament. Here's why:
- Cross-Divisional and Cross-Tier Games:
- Throughout the season, teams play against opponents from different divisions and tiers. This creates variability in the level of competition faced by each team.
- Strength of Schedule:
- The formula considers the difficulty of each team's schedule. A win against a higher-tier or higher-ranked team is weighted more heavily than a win against a lower-tier team.
- This ensures that teams are rewarded for performing well against stronger competition.
- Balanced Assessment:
- By using the formula, we avoid simple win-loss records as the sole determinant for seeding. Instead, the formula provides a more nuanced evaluation of team performance, taking into account both the quality of opponents and the outcomes of the games.
This system ensures that the tournament seeding reflects the true competitive standing of each team, promoting fairness and rewarding teams that excel against tougher opponents.
Ranking Formulation:
-
Award 50 points for a win over an upper tier opponent.
-
Award 20 points for a loss to an upper tier opponent.
-
Award 40 points for a victory over a same tier opponent.
-
Award 10 points for a loss to a same tier opponent.
-
Award 30 points for a win over a lower tier team.
-
Award 0 points for a loss to a lower tier team.
-
A forfeiture is a win for the team receiving the forfeiture and a loss for the team that does the forfeiting.
-
Each team receives 2 bonus points per each opponent wins regardless of class and the number of times played during regular season.
-
Divide the total number of points by the total number of regular season point-producing games played to determine mathematical point average.
